法庭鏖战 经典判例 论著随笔 律师服务 版权法规
电影拍摄案 主编署名权 脸谱版权案 四合院拆迁 央视台标案 足球赛合同 地图册署名 正乙祠戏楼 广告词侵权 侵犯著作权 女人当家案 音乐版权案 无单放货案 股权转让案 二手房交易 故宫仿真画
商标注册 国际注册 商标代理 商标保护 经典案例 商标法规
商品房篇 二手房篇 物业管理 楼市指南 楼市访谈 动态传真 律师服务 房产法规
公司治理 国企改制 公司诉讼 股东诉讼 法律顾问 特许经营 公司法规
合同问答 合同风险 案例分析 合同范本 法规详解 合同法规
离婚指南 协议离婚 财产分割 子女抚养 离婚赔偿 离婚误区 涉外离婚 离婚之后 事实婚姻 聘请律师 律师视线 婚姻法规
员工权利 补偿赔偿 工伤保险 竞业禁止 商业秘密 劳动合同 社会保险
劳动争议 劳动顾问 委托律师 劳动法规
业务范围 长济动态 主要律师 招聘律师 律师相册
主任律师 纪实特写 神圣使命 法律著述 律师瞬间
诉讼顾问 诉讼咨询 患者权利 事故处理 诉讼须知 典型案例 技术鉴定 司法鉴定 损害赔偿 医疗规范 管理制度 医事法律
长济顾问 服务方式 工作范围 顾问分类 常年顾问 专项顾问 公司顾问 私人顾问 远程顾问
公益诉讼意义 国外公益诉讼 公益诉讼律师 公益诉讼案件 公益诉讼协作
人身伤害 交通事故 医疗事故 劳动工伤 精神损害 知识产权 产品责任 环境污染 保险理赔 国家赔偿
现在开庭 经典案例 仲裁指南 律师问答 律师服务 外贸法规
以案说法 楼市随笔 忠告问答 手续税费 房屋贷款 律师服务 二手房法规
服务项目 走出国门 开办条件 离岸公司 热点国家
律师权利 律师服务 诉讼流程 刑法词典 问题解疑 辩护实录 经典案例 律师视线 法规解读 刑事法规
知识产权 法律顾问 行政案件 刑事诉讼 民事诉讼 仲裁工作 婚姻家庭 劳动争议 医患纠纷 国企改制 收购公司 企业破产 国际货运 建设工程 房屋拆迁 房屋交付 房屋交易 房屋租赁 房地产  二手房买卖 信用证……
民事案件 刑事案件 行政案件 劳动案件 仲裁案件 执行案件 法律援助 公证指南 诉讼证据 诉讼费用 诉讼文书
知识产权 公司事务 建筑房产 二手房产 合同实务 国际贸易 劳动争议 婚姻家庭 刑事诉讼 损害赔偿 民事诉讼 律师法律
风险代理 代理范围 收费标准 代理方案 代理案例
诉讼业务 非诉业务 执业经验
律师营销浅谈 实习律师雕琢 青年律师成长 成功律师感悟 女性律师追梦 刑辩律师困惑 知名律师纪实 中国律师现状 律师神圣使命 律师职业规划 律师文化建设 司法考试园地
全国优秀律师事务所、中国十大金牌律师事务所——北京长济律师事务所主办‖全国优秀律师、中国十大最具影响力律师、中国百强大律师朱寿全主持

www.148-law.com
English Version
联系律师 聘请律师
法律咨询 招聘律师
意见建议 友情链接
收藏本页 本站导航
北京长济律所 长济主任律师 法庭鏖战精选 长济律师荣誉 长济律师视点 视频报道专辑 法治人物聚焦 律师风险代理 律师业务指引 律师实务探讨 律师成长之路
法律顾问在线 公司事务律师 版权律师在线 商标律师在线 专利律师在线 建筑与房地产 二手房产律师 合同实务律师 婚姻家庭律师 劳动争议律师 损害赔偿律师
刑事辩护律师 海外购房置业 国际贸易律师 公益诉讼在线 注册海外公司 医疗事故律师 聘请律师指南 诉讼仲裁指南 法律法规总汇 热点法律新闻 法律幽默集锦
 在线法律咨询
刑事辩护咨询 知识产权咨询
公司法律咨询 合同法律咨询
婚姻家庭咨询 劳动争议咨询
房产法律咨询 损害赔偿咨询
留言本 留言本2 律师函复
律师卡 联系律师 聘请律师

 会员登陆

用户名
密 码
找回密码

 聘请律师
1.聘请律师:委托律师代理法律事务可按下面的电话联系或填写聘请律师表单
2.法律咨询
 《律师卡》会员(高级会员)可拨打“聘请律师电话”咨询法律问题
 非《律师卡》会员(含一般会员)如单纯咨询法律问题,请勿拨打“聘请律师电话”,请先查看留言与咨询


点击民生热点法律问题丛书
物业纠纷律师在线答疑
物权纠纷律师在线答疑
合同纠纷律师在线答疑
劳动合同纠纷律师在线答疑
社会保险纠纷律师在线答疑
房屋拆迁纠纷律师在线答疑
房屋买卖纠纷律师在线答疑
土地承包纠纷律师在线答疑

 特别提示
1. 请您记住:
  www.148-law.com
 (148要司法;law法律)
 本网名称:在线律师
2.在线律师网由中国十大最具影响力律师全国优秀律师中国百强大律师2010品牌中国律师行业年度人物2010中国最具影响力年度新闻人物第6届感动中国十大新闻人物2009中华之魂十大先锋人物2009榜样中国十大榜样人物2009中国骄傲十大领军人物2008创业中国十大风云人物2007和谐中国十大杰出人物朱寿全主任律师主持。 全国优秀律师事务所、中国十大金牌律师事务所北京长济律师事务所资深律师为您提供专业法律服务

 法律新闻
首页>>国际贸易律师>>外经外贸法规

外经外贸法规

English Version

最高人民法院关于审理
反倾销行政案件应用法律若干问题的规定

Announcement of the Supreme People's Court of the People's Republic of China

Article 1. The people's courts shall accept the following administrative suits against anti-dumping administrative acts pursuant to law:
1) Final decisions on dumping and dumping margin, damage and damage degree;
2) Decisions on whether to collect anti-dumping duties, as well as decisions on retroactive collection, refund, and collection on new export operators;
3) Re-examination decisions on preservation, modification or cancellation of anti-dumping duties and price undertakings;
4) Other anti-dumping acts indictable pursuant to laws and administrative regulations.

Article 2. Individuals or organizations that have legal interest relations with the anti-dumping administrative acts may bring administrative suits with the people's court as interested parties pursuant to the Administrative Litigation Law and other relevant laws and administrative regulations.

Interested parties as used in the preceding paragraph shall refer to the applicants, relevant export and import operators, and other natural persons, legal persons or other organizations with legal interest relations that file written applications for anti-dumping investigation with the authority under the State Council.

Article 3. The defendant of an anti-dumping administrative case shall be the authority under the State Council that conducted the corresponding indicted anti-dumping administrative act.

Article 4. Other authorities under the State Council that have legal interest relations with the indicted anti-dumping administrative act may participate in the suit as a third party.

Article 5. Anti-dumping administrative cases of the first instance shall be under the jurisdiction of the following people's courts:
1) Intermediate people's court designated by the higher people's court of the place where the defendant is located;
2) Higher people's court of the place where the defendant is located.

Article 6. The people' s court shall make examination of legality of the factual and legal issues of the indicted anti-dumping administrative act pursuant to the Administrative Litigation Law and other relevant laws and administrative regulations on anti-dumping, and by referring to the departmental regulations of the State Council.

Article 7. The defendant shall bear the burden of proof for the indicted anti-dumping administrative act it conducted, and shall provide evidences for the anti-dumping administrative act and the regulatory documents on which the act is based.

The people's court shall examine the legality of the indicted anti-dumping administrative act on the basis of the file records of the defendant. Factual materials that weren't been written in the files when the defendant conducted the indicted anti-dumping administrative act shall not be taken as the ground for finding that act legal.

Article 8. The plaintiff is obliged to provide evidence for the facts it claims. If the evidence provided by the plaintiff is relevant, legal and true upon examination by the people's court pursuant to statutory procedures, such evidence may be taken as the ground for the decision. .

If the defendant requests the plaintiff to provide evidence pursuant to statutory procedures in the anti-dumping administrative investigation proceedings, and the plaintiff refuses to provide without good reasons, provides untrue evidence or seriously hampers the investigation by other means, the evidence then provided by the plaintiff in the litigation proceedings will not be adopted by the people's court.

Article 9. In the anti-dumping administrative investigation procedures, if the interested parties refuse to provide evidences without good reasons, provide any untrue evidence or seriously hamper the investigation by other means, the factual conclusions made by the authority under the State Council through the evidences available may be held as supported by good evidences.

Article 10. In hearing of anti-dumping administrative cases, the people's court shall render the following judgments according to different situations:
1) If the evidence for the indicted anti-dumping administrative act is conclusive, the application of laws and administrative regulations to the act is correct, and the legal procedure is complied with, the act shall be sustained by judgment;
2) If the indicted anti-dumping administrative act has been in one of the following circumstances, the act shall be annulled or partially annulled by judgment, or the defendant may be required by judgment to conduct the anti-dumping administrative act anew:
a. Inadequacy of essential evidences;
b. Erroneous application of the laws or administrative regulations;
c. Violation of legal procedure;
d. Ultra vires; or
e. Abuse of powers.
3) Other judgments that may be rendered pursuant to laws or judicial interpretations.

Article 11. In hearing anti-dumping administrative cases, the people' s court may refer to the provisions on civil procedures involving foreign elements.

Article 12. These Provisions shall come into force on January 1, 2003.

>>外经外贸法规目录页

海外购房置业 长济律师事务所

长济律师事务所

聘请律师Beijing Changji Law Office All Rights Reserved 北京长济律师事务所《在线律师》版权所有 English Version